Monday, January 11, 2010

The hand analysis of the Princess of Wales, Lady Diana

Diana, the Princess of Wales was not an heir to the throne of England, but her hands show that she had some blue-blood, if not running in her veins, then certainly in her heart and soul. Whether it was poise, sensitivity and grace that she had, or whether it was the love and care and compassion that she felt for people, this woman was a real queen. She was born an aristocrat and died as one. Her hands explain why she threw it all away and they will also tell us why her marriage to Prince Charles was doomed from the start.

Diana's hands have light lines, and the ridges seem fine, and palm soft. She has a low-set thumb, and this is the most important digit in hand reading. It shows her
deep compassion and love for people. This is collaborated by the development of the Mount of Venus.

Check out her hand photos here and here.

Talent for making money
Her hand shows the ability to make money. This sign (the development of the second phalanges) is usually seen on square-tipped, square, practical hands. Successful businessmen often have this sign. Therefore this money making quality sits a little oddly with her, but then every individual is a hotpot of different qualities and it is what makes us all unique. Diana’s hands also show her to be an idealistic person in many ways, sensitive too. And her hand shows her to be inward thinking (bent Saturn). If we take money-making talent + idealism + a love for humanity, what do we get? But let's not connect the dots as yet...

Diana’s Sun finger is good, which shows her attractive personality and spontaneity, and even a kind of brilliance. As the finger is a little low-set it takes away a significant portion of a person’s desire for wealth and fame...and when one connects the dots, one finds a person who can make money if she wants to, but does not really want to, not for herself that is. Her lack of love for money is collaborated by other signs, like the less developed third phalanges of her Mercury and Sun fingers. Diana always lived on a higher plane, and it was but natural that she would turn to raise money for charity. However, she was not consistent, and the explanation for that is further down the post.

Her personal life
Diana may have had a fantastic public persona, and with good reason, but she was very different in her personal life. It is almost as if she had a double personality. She was not an easy person to live with. She had emotional conflicts and was fragile, and thus only an equally sensitive person could have understood her.

A combination of signs including her strong Jupiter finger and slightly bent Apollo finger, tells us that she needed attention (not just public attention). Diana lacked aggressiveness (Mars not very developed), but her hands show that she did not lack any ability to manipulate.

Diana could also see the negative side to almost everything quite easily (including herself). People with this sign usually find it difficult to enjoy themselves or be happy for long. There is an increased tendency towards jealousy. If things did not go her way, if Di did not get the attention she needed, then she would suffer, either with jealousy, or bitterness. Quite the opposite of Charles in fact. A lot of people have written that it was he who was jealous of the attention that Diana got in public, but Charles' hands show that he is not that type. His evident displeasure had more to do with anger, rather than jealousy.

Diana was not a fighter, quite deficient in Martian qualities. She lacked a fighting spirit and staying power, and lacked aggressiveness as well. She would prefer to suffer in silence, expecting to be understood, expecting to be treated fairly. It is likely that Diana was lacking in energy as well, to some extent, and this can be seen from the hand she held her hand. Such people cannot sustain any career or work for very long. This would be a dampener on the good points shown by her thumb because she would not be consistent. I have seen this sign (of a certain listlessness) on some hands of people who have emotional problems.

In addition, Lady Diana was impulsive and impressionable and yet wilful. Not a very good combination. 

Charles and Diana
Diana married Prince Charles for love, but public reports indicate that they never got along. A comparison of their hands reveals why. He is a straightforward, aggressive, short-tempered and proud person while she was like a delicate flower which needed watering.

Diana had not married Prince Charles to be queen, but to be loved and cherished like a princess. She could have sustained a long-term relationship with a man who was attentive, devoted, and attentive.

Related Reading: The hand analysis of her husband Prince Charles and her son Prince William or her daughter-in-law Meghan Markle.
The hand analysis of Gordon Brown, now ex-PM of England.
The hand analysis of a British celebrity Robert Pattinson.





4 comments:

  1. CAN WE KNOW THE DEGREE OF BEAUTY FROM HAND PRINTS?
    MANY BEAUTIFUL WOMENS DONOT HAVE GOOD HEALTH & DIED EARLY.HOW ABOUT THEIR DESTINY?IN GENERAL ALL PEOPLES LIVE IN NORMAL COURSE & SO CHANGE OF LINES IS VERY RARE.TO CHANGE LINES VERY GOOD EFFORTS NEEDED.CAN WE CHANGE LINES BY TAKING GOOD FOOD&BY DOING FASTS?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Refinement, sensitivity and sensibility can be told by the hand. Inner beauty finally translates into physical beauty, as the person ages. About beautiful women not having good health, this is not true. Health is nothing to do with looks. Also lines changing is common, not rare. It is rare indeed for lines not to change. Perhaps lines not changing can happen in very dull people who live fixed lives in one place without much exposure to people. However major lines do not change in all people, but even major lines changing is not rare.
    Lines change because we change, and it has nothing to do with fasts. For example if a headline shows lack of concentration and the person makes effort to improve it through meditation, memory exercises, and diet, yes the headline will change. It is the quality of the person which has to change, only then the lines will change.

    ReplyDelete
  3. R/MADAM,
    AS PLANTS MOVES & AS OUR LIFE PROCESS THERE IS CERTAIN WE HAVE SONE MINOR CHANGES IN LINES.BUT IN GENERAL ORIGINAL SCRIPT FORM REMAINS AS IT IS.CAN WE KNOW FOR WHAT WE ARE IN THIS WORLD.WHICH IS OUR PART TO PLAY?WHY WE HAVE GIVEN OUR SPECIFIC HAND,MOUNT,SHAPE,& LINES?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Shriram, the original "script" can change. I think I have already mentioned this to you before. The problem is that if people do not change the "script" does not change. Many people have a fatalistic attitude and feel that it is no use changing because fate is important, and naturally in their case their life won't change and nor their lines.

    ReplyDelete

Your polite comments are welcome! And those who use the name "Anonymous" may not get their comments published because it becomes difficult to distinguish between different commentators. You don't have to use your real name but do use some name! Thanks.