Monday, August 8, 2011

Rani Mukerji's hand reading

Rani Mukerjee’s hands are not like that of a typical film star. Her hands show a personality with a love of order, punctuality, security, and also a sensible and practical attitude toward most things. It is because of this down-to-earth attitude that she is able to keep her ego in the backseat. It's not as if she doesn’t have an ego, because she does. It's just that she is too practical to let it interfere with her work.

The main features of her hand are her broad, large palm, short fingers with knots and squarish tips, and developed mounts, particularly Jupiter, although the Moon mount is developed as well. What makes these features significant is that these signs are fairly pronounced. Her lines are dark and the headline is long and slightly sloping. The heartline is also long and curves up into the Jupiter mount. The thumb is long as well, with a long first phalange. The phalanges of her fingers are more or less normal, although the third phalanges are a little thick. The Mercury (little) finger is long.

These hand features tell us that Rani has plenty of common sense and is a very capable woman, with great organisational abilities. She is a pragmatic soul, and reasonably tolerant and broadminded although she could be a little idealistic in love.

Temper and aggression are not very much evident on her hand and besides, she has self-control and discipline, as well and also the ability to remain calm under pressure. She is fairly straightforward and her hand shows some introversion and shyness.

rani mukerjee photo

Rani’s hands show talent, though not of the exceptional kind. She is lucky to have garnered the kind of success she has. Her hand does not show an artistic bent of mind. If she has made acting her profession, she has gone against her basic nature, but being the extremely capable person she is, she can do anything she sets her mind to. She is determined and disciplined (though not aggressive) and if she makes up her mind she can go and get whatever she wants. This is a quality seen in the hands of many successful people.

Ego, pride and ambition are part of her persona. She tends to be a little domineering, and if it is kept in balance it is because she is a sensible woman. She has a melancholy and moody side to her disposition.

What annoys her is underhandedness or carelessness. She is good-hearted and helpful and generous and is also unselfish, and fairly direct in her dealings.

Read about the personalities of famous actresses like Kareena KapoorKatrina KaifPriyanka ChopraBipasha BasuAishwarya RaiDeepika Padukone or the famous Indian actor: Madhuri Dixit.

Or perhaps you would like to read a comparison of Kareena, Katrina, Priyanka or Aishwarya?

You will also find hand readings of male Bollywood stars like Hrithik RoshanAamir Khan or Rajesh Khanna and many more.

Click on the label Bollywood to find out what these actors are really like as people, or you can check out the actors from Hollywood instead.

(The photograph is from the free photo section of Bollywood Sargam)


  1. Rani Mukherjee is not seen much these days in films. I was never a fan of hers, but I agree that she is a very talented lady. Interesting to know about her practical nature.

  2. TN, I think that Bollywood films are not very kind to the leading ladies. Rani is on her way out now, I think.

  3. I too have a positive opinion about her acting. But the extraordinary talent part did surprise me quite a bit.

    Destination Infinity

  4. DI, I think she hasn't got the kind of films that would showcase her acting skills.

  5. Sometimes, looks do get in the way of a successful acting career. Whenever I think of Rani, I can see her smile. She's smiling in all her movies for the most part. In such cases, it's hard to break this pattern and show any versatality,however hard one may try.I think that's the case with Rani.

  6. I guess she does smile a lot. I think that is the kind of roles she gets, the simpering, looking pretty, flirty kinds. that's the kind of roles most women get in bollywood films. she has a bad choice of movies I think. I too do not see any versatility in her roles. but that is the roles, not her. she is capable of a lot more.


Your polite comments are welcome! And those who use the name "Anonymous" may not get their comments published because it becomes difficult to distinguish between different commentators. You don't have to use your real name but do use some name! Thanks.